Menu

Category Archives: Digital Lifestyle

An all-in-one Apple media subscription plan could upset the content cart

An all-in-one Apple media subscription plan could upset the content cart

Apple CEO Tim Cook has been vocal about growing the company’s Services business as way to not only diversify its revenue stream, but in my view also make its iOS and other devices even stickier with consumers. As we have seen before Content is King is a key driver in our Digital Lifestyle investing them and index as consumers will move or remain for original content that resonates with them.

Apple’s move into original content is arguably one of the worst kept secrets, but as we have seen time and time again Apple will make the formal move with a product or service when it’s ready to do so. As Apple prepares for this, it looks to be addressing one of the growing issues faced by consumers – the rising cost of content faced by consumers. These are the same consumers that have cut their pay TV subscription and landline telephone services in a bid to skinny down that monthly bill. Yet, if consumers could see it rival their once costly cable bill.

We therefore find it interesting and potentially compelling that Apple would bundle its content offerings (music, video, news/magazine) into one monthly bill, especially if the price point is $9.99 vs. the current Apple Music monthly subscription that costs $9.99 per month, or $14.99 per month for a family subscription.  While it may take time for Apple to challenge Netflix with original video content, such a move could put a thorn in the side of Hulu, Apple friendly Disney and Spotify but be a boon for those impacted by our Middle Class Squeeze investing theme.

 

Via The Information, Apple is apparently considering combining its upcoming magazine service and original content television, with its existing music subscription, into a single ‘Amazon Prime’-esque subscription. Pricing for this bundle is not clear, right now Apple offers Apple Music for $9.99 per month.The report says Apple will allow customers to subscribe to each service separately, perhaps there is a cost saving in subscribing to the all-encompassing package compared to paying for each individually however.Try Amazon Prime 30-Day Free TrialEchoing a timeline previously reported by Bloomberg, The Information says the company wants to a launch an Apple branded news subscription service in 2019. The company acquired Texture in March of this year, a $9.99/mo subscription service that unlocked access to more than 200 premium magazines.The timeline for Apple’s original content TV efforts is still murky, but there are some hints that the first shows will be ready to air later next year. TV show production is often prone to delays and setbacks, but Apple has enough shows in the wings at the moment that it should still have a healthy offering even if only half of the orders are ready in 2019.

Source: Report: Apple mulling all-in-one media subscription plan, combining Apple Music, TV shows and magazines | 9to5Mac

AT&T and Time Warner launch WatchTV, with new unlimited data plans

AT&T and Time Warner launch WatchTV, with new unlimited data plans

The dust has barely settled on the legal ruling that is paving the way for AT&T (T) to combine with Time Warner (TWX), and we are alread hearing of new products and services to stem from this combination. No surprise as we are seeing a blurring between mobile networks and devices, social media and content companies as Apple (AAPL), Facebook (FB), Google (GOOGL) and now AT&T join the hunt for original content alongside Netflix (NFLX), Amazon (AMZN), and Hulu, which soon may be controlled by Disney if it successfully fends of Comcast to win 21st Century Fox.

While we as consumers have become used to having the content I want, when I want it with Tivo and then the content I want, when I want it on the device I want it on with streaming services, it looks now like it will be “the content I want, when I want it, on the device I want on the platform I choose.” All part of the overlapping to be had with our Connected Society and Content is King investing themes that we are reformulating into Digital Lifestyle – more on that soon.

In short, a content arms race is in the offing, and it will likely ripple through broadcast TV as well as advertising. Think of it as a sequel to what we saw with newspaper, magazine and book publishing as new business models for streaming content come to market… the looming question in my mind is how much will today’s consumer have to spend on all of these offerings before it becomes too pricey?

And what about Sprint (S) and T-Mobile USA (TMUS)…

 

Taking advantage of the recent approval of its merger with Time Warner, AT&T on Thursday announced WatchTV, a new live TV service premiering next week — and initially tied to two new unlimited wireless data plans.

WatchTV incorporates over 30 channels, among them several under the wing of Time Warner such as CNN, Cartoon Network, TBS, and Turner Classic Movies. Sometime after launch AT&T will grow the lineup to include Comedy Central, Nicktoons, and several other channels.

People will be able to watch on “virtually every current smartphone, tablet, or Web browser,” as well as “certain streaming devices.” The company didn’t immediately specify compatible Apple platforms, but these will presumably include at least the iPhone and iPad, given their popularity and AT&T’s long-standing relationship with Apple.

The first data plan is “AT&T Unlimited &More”, which will also include $15 in monthly credit towards DirecTV Now. People who pay extra for “&More Premium” will get higher-quality video, 15 gigabytes of tethered data, and the option to add one of several “premium” services at no charge — initial examples include TV channels like HBO or Showtime, and music platforms like Pandora Premium or Amazon Music Unlimited.

&More Premium customers can also choose to apply their $15 credit towards DirecTV or U-verse TV, instead of just DirecTV Now.

WatchTV will at some point be available as a $15-per-month standalone service, but no timeline is available.

Source: AT&T uses Time Warner merger to launch WatchTV, paired with new unlimited data plans

Lord & Taylor’s owner Hudson Bay increasingy focused on digital

Lord & Taylor’s owner Hudson Bay increasingy focused on digital

What can we say other than it’s the latest sign of the woes faced by traditional brick & mortar retailers – the closing of once iconic flagship locations as they are caught between the push-pull of our investment themes. In this case it’s the accelerating shift toward digital shopping that is part of our Connected Society or Digital Lifestyle investing theme as well as our Cash-strapped Consumer one.

While Hudson Bay once expected to keep a scaled down version of the iconic Lord & Taylor location on Fifth Avenue, it has since decided to throw in the towel all together. Future generations may never know the beauty of Lord & Taylor’s Holiday Windows… unless Hudson Bay gives them a digital makeover as well.

 

Hudson’s Bay (HBAYF), the Canadian-based owner of Lord & Taylor and Saks Fifth Avenue, agreed last October to sell the Fifth Avenue store to WeWork for $850 million. The iconic store is located between 38th and 39th Streets and not far from Times Square.

The original plan was for the store to become WeWork’s New York headquarters after the 2018 holiday season. After that, approximately 150,000 square feet of the building would continue to be run as a scaled-down Lord & Taylor.

But that is no longer the case. Hudson’s Bay said late Monday that it “has decided not to maintain a presence at [the Fifth Avenue] location following turnover of the building to WeWork.”

The company said that “exiting this iconic space” — which first opened in 1914 — is a reflection of “Lord & Taylor’s increasing focus on its digital opportunity and [Hudson’s Bay] commitment to improving profitability.”

Hudson’s Bay is turning to Amazon rival Walmart (WMT) for assistance in the digital shopping arena. Walmart announced last November that Lord & Taylor will have a flagship store on Walmart.com.

The companies added last month that the online store is set to launch in the coming weeks with more than 125 brands and will feature free two-day shipping for orders over $35.

Source: Lord & Taylor is closing its 5th Ave store

All those streaming services can add up to serious $$

All those streaming services can add up to serious $$

We continue to hear more and more about chord cutting as consumers increasingly to over the top and streaming vidoe services and they shift how, where and when they consume that content. Given the Content is King perspective that we have, it comes as little surprise to see that consumers are utilizing multiple platforms because they want the content they want – plain and simple.

While it’s one thing to have one or two streaming services, as companies like Apple and Disney/ESPN follow Netflix, Amazon, Hulu and others  the content game,  it means consumers could very well see their montly content bill soon rival the monthly cable bill they were looking to avoid. If we game it out, it means either consumers will swallow and pay those bills or as we have seen with in other industries market share will consolidate around less than a handful of providors. In many ways this will be the same evolution the internet went through over the last decade plus, the only difference is it will be unfolding not on the PC but across all of our other connected devices.

No matter what type of media consumer you are, there’s a difference between paying $13.99 per month for Netflix and the thousands of dollars you will be paying per year when you add up all the streaming services you will probably want to subscribe to. And that doesn’t even include the $40 to $300+ per month you will have to spend on broadband access. Let’s have a look at the various ways you might spend your streaming media dollars.

Movies, TV, and Video Streaming Services … Oh, My!

The rise of video streaming services has given us a world of alternatives to traditional cable and satellite video providers. Whether you’re a cord-cutter (ditching cable in favor of streaming services), a cord never (someone who’s never paid a cable provider for monthly services), or a cord plus (someone who pays for cable plus services like Netflix or Hulu), you’re likely paying for at least some of these services:

  • Netflix – $13.99/month ($10.99/month without 4K)
  • Hulu – $11.99/month ($9.99/month with ads)
  • Amazon Prime Video – $13/month (includes free shipping on Amazon purchases)
  • CBS All-Access – $9.99/month ($5.99/month with ads)
  • HBO Now – $14.99/month
  • Showtime Anytime – $10.99/month
  • Starz Play – $8.99/month
  • YouTube Premium – $11.99/month

What started out as an inexpensive way to replace trips to Blockbuster (or to keep you from buying DVDs) has turned into a battleground for your eyes and your wallet. And if you’ve got TV FOMO? Forget about it. Almost every service offers at least some awesome original content. We are lucky to be living in the Platinum Age of video storytelling.

I paid $99 for the first year of CBS All-Access, just to watch Star Trek: Discovery. Is that a smart financial decision? No! Is it worth it? For me it is, because I am a die-hard Star Trek fan and Discovery is awesome!

What further complicates the issue is the ever-changing landscape of rights ownership. Want to binge Parks and Recreation? Better sign up for Netflix. Oh, it’s on Hulu now? Better pay for that, too. Sure, you could buy the complete series on DVD for less than $50, but are you really going to get up from the couch and walk over to the DVD player 21 times to swap out the discs?

Source: Streaming Sticker Shock – Shelly Palmer

Coca-Cola + Bluetooth = Connected, Customizable Soda Machines

While we applaud Coca-Cola (KO) for embracing technology to connect with consumers while enabling them to customize their soda beverage of choice, the larger question to us is how does this fit with the shifting consumer preference for healthy food, snacks and drinks? In many ways it appears that Coca-Cola is looking to extend the life of its high margin sugary/diet beverage business that it has even though that case volume, even for Diet Coke and other diet beverages, have been under pressure. With PepsiCo’s (PEP) launch of its own flavored setzer brand in a bid to catch National Beverage’s (FIZZ) La Croix brand, we’re wondering if Coke has identified such an opportunity for a Freestyle machine…. perhaps the 9200 model?

 

Coca-Cola is unveiling a new fountain drink machine this weekend that lets you use Bluetooth technology to prepare your drink precisely the way you want it with a few taps on your smartphone. The upgraded machine, called the Freestyle 9100, also has some new, but not yet activated, features Coca-Cola expects to need in the future. With the activation of a microphone, for instance, it could mix drinks from voice commands.

While a Coke dispenser might seem like a strange place to find innovation, it’s the kind of move that could give the Atlanta-based soft-drink giant an advantage in the hyper-competitive beverage market. Smartphones make sense for drink ordering, because they will not only allow you to order exact percentages of different mixtures or flavor addition but also remember your preference for next time.

Empowering people to customize their creations — in this case, over ice — helps companies build long-lasting relationships with them, according to consumer behavior experts. That translates into more frequent and larger purchases.

“A greater level of customization really allows companies to connect with consumers, especially when it’s what they’re looking for and making them feel special,” said Charles Lindsey, an associate professor of marketing at the University at Buffalo.

Source: Coca-Cola, Bluetooth let you make personalized drinks

Source: Coca-Cola, Bluetooth let you make personalized drinks

Fortnite is the harbinger of more pain for the already struggling toy industry

While it is rather clear to us why Toys R Us is filing bankruptcy and even Star Wars themed toy sales weren’t enough to help Mattel (MAT) this past holiday season, in-app purchases for the new iOS version of Fortnite are rather revealing. The recently launched gaming app, which sits at the center of our Connected Society and Content is King investing themes, typifies the shift toward gaming, and mobile gaming, in particular, that has changed the kinds of toys that children of all ages play with.

At Tematica we like to say confirming data points for our investment themes are all around us in everyday life. In this case, all one has to do is look at the kinds of “toys” being used by children, tweens and teens as well as some adult – smartphones and in some cases tablets to play games, read or even stream movies and TVs. With a nearly endless choice of games, books and video content, one has to wonder how long traditional toys, such as action figures and dolls, can survive? Perhaps they will in a limited form that powers licensable content to gaming and content producers much the way the struggling comic industry is being utilized at the movie box office.

That would mean companies like Mattel and Hasbro (HAS) understand what it takes to pivot and capture the benefits of our Asset-lite Business Model investing theme.

 

Though it launched on iOS as a limited “early release” last Thursday, Epic Games’ Fortnite is already sitting atop the App Store’s free app download charts and, according to fresh estimates from Sensor Tower, has grossed more than $1.5 million in worldwide in-app purchases.

Players spend real money to buy V-Bucks, which can be redeemed for skins, accessory modifications, character animations and more. Currently, V-Buck packs range from $9.99 for 1,000 currency units to $99.99 for 10,000 units. Larger purchases net additional in-game currency, for example the $99.99 tier comes with an extra 3,500 V-Bucks on top of the standard 10,000 units.

According to the report, $1 million of Epic’s total estimated earnings came in the first three days after in-app purchases were activated. The performance puts Fortnite well ahead of similar battle royale style games Knives Out and Rules of Survival, which earned approximately $57,000 and $39,000, respectively, when they debuted.

A separate report from Apptopia adds color to Epic’s release, noting the game now sits in the No. 1 overall App Store spot in 89 markets. Currently the second-highest grossing game in the U.S. behind App Store stalwart Candy Crush Saga, Fortnite appears in the top-ten highest grossing charts in 15 markets, the analytics firm says.

 

Source: Fortnite estimated to have grossed $1.5M in in-app purchases after 4 days on iOS App Store

Disney’s The Black Panther gets 4 of 4 paws

Disney’s The Black Panther gets 4 of 4 paws

While we tend to focus on global-macro and thematic investing here at Tematica, we are people and that means that from time to time we too like to have some fun and share some of the things we find enjoyable. It doesn’t hurt that in some instances the little pleasures fit with our investment themes or spring from a company on the Tematica Investing Select List. So from time to time, we’ll let our hair down so to speak and share some of those things that we’re doing, spending on, seeing, and more importantly enjoying.

As a long-time self-confessed comic book nerd, I plunked down my money and eagerly saw The Black Panther, the latest in a series of box office crushing films from Disney (DIS) owned Marvel Studios. The storyline, the conclusion of which promises to alter the course of the Marvel Cinematic Universe as well as set up Marvel’s Avengers: Infinity War, was enjoyable even though to most comic book nerds it is somewhat predictable. That said, much like Iron Man, Captain American: The First Avenger and even Ant-Manthere is much back story groundwork to be covered, especially in this newer aspect of Marvel Cinematic Universe. To say Marvel has become adept at layering the backstory into the story telling process would be an understatement, but much credit also has to go to director Ryan Coogler who filmed a thoroughly enjoyable and digestibly dense movie, that

Are the characters multi-faceted and more than dimensional? Yes, and I credit Marvel’s history of story-telling, which has improved much over the 10-years it has been delivering films based on its characters. The Black Pantheralso used humor well, far better than, in my opinion, too jokey Thor: Ragnarok.

Did I like how King T’Challa’s honor guard was, much like the comics, staffed by more than capable warriors, all of which were women? Loved it and not because it allowed Marvel to check several diversity boxes, quelling much of the criticism it has received with its prior slate of movies. Did the check boxing seem forced? Not at all, rather it fit perfectly with the storyline and history of the Black Panther – all one needs to do is read the source material.

Does King T’Challa’s sister Shuri look to give Marvel’s Tony Stark a run for his money in the techno-genius department? Based on the various technologies created by Shuri that are on display in the movie, it sure does and there’s the added benefit that when needed Shuri kicks butt AND keeps the banter going. To Robert Downey Jr.’s Tony Stark, all I can say is, watch out! The portrayal of Shuri by Letitia Wright, Nakia by Lupita Nyong’o and Okoye by Danai Gurira shows that Marvel can deliver well rounded female characters that can be funny, smart and strong. I can’t wait for Marvel’s Captain Marvel.

The bottom line is whether you’re a fan of super hero films or not, it’s a well-crafted story that expands as well as enhances the Marvel tapestry, and the post-credit scenes advance the inter connected storyline that Marvel has carefully put in place over the last 10 years. It’s great fun, and I recommend seeing it.

I give The Black Panthergets 4 or of 4 paws and you can watch the trailer here.

Are there positive Content is King implications for Disney to be had with The Black Panther above and beyond the box office? In my view, it’s a clear cut “yes” and I’ll be sharing those thoughts with subscribers to Tematica Investing in the coming week.

  • Our long-term price target on the shares for Content is King company Disney (DIS) remains $125

 

Disney’s buying Fox has a Connected Society appeal

With consumers increasing shifting their content consumption to streaming services, be it online or via mobile, we are seeing a number of moves by companies to position themselves accordingly. AT&T (T) is looking to buy Time Warner (TWX), Alphabet (GOOGL) is expanding the reach of YouTubeTV and Apple (AAPL) is hiring programming talent. Amid all of this, Disney scooped up key content assets of Twenty-first Century Fox (FOXA) this week, a long-time strategy of the House of Mouse, but it also acquired the controlling interest in stream service Hulu.

That extra nugget could radically change and potentially accelerate Disney’s already announced plan to launch its own set of streaming services, one for Disney content and the other for ESPN. We see this as a potential gamechanger that also adds our Connected Society tailwind to the Content is King company that is Disney.

 

The deal puts Fox’s movie studio, 20th Century Fox, under the Disney umbrella, bringing with it the studio’s intellectual property. Having 20th Century Fox’s “X-Men” and “Avatar” under the same roof as Disney’s “The Avengers” and “Star Wars” could have huge ramifications in both the streaming world and the film industry.

Disney announced in August that it will pull its content from Netflix, effectively ending its relationship with the streaming service to start its own in 2019. This means Netflix users will no longer be able to watch content from Lucasfilm, Marvel, Pixar and Disney Animation.The deal between the two media giants means that Disney’s streaming service will include its own deep vault of intellectual property, as well as Fox’s decades of popular franchises, which would most likely get pulled from streaming competitors.

As much as this deal is about the content that Disney would be getting from Fox, it’s also about content competitors like Netflix would not.The deal also means Fox’s stakes in Hulu now belong to Disney, which already has an equal stake along with Comcast. With a majority stake in Hulu, Disney could change the award-winning streaming service’s offerings.

Source: What the Disney-Fox deal means for Marvel, ‘Avatar,’ and streaming – Dec. 14, 2017

The acquisition of Fox brings content, streaming and another thematic tailwind to Disney

The acquisition of Fox brings content, streaming and another thematic tailwind to Disney

After days of speculation, Content is King champ Walt Disney (DIS) formally announced it was acquiring the film, television and international businesses of Twenty-First Century Fox Inc (FOXA) for $52.4 billion in stock. Viewed through our thematic lens, Disney is once again expanding its content library, which means that finally the X-Men and other characters will be reunited with their Marvel brethren under one roof. As the inner comic book geek in me sees it, perhaps we will know get the X-Men movie we deserve.

While I only half kid about the comic book potential of the deal, the reality is the transaction expands Disney’s reach to include movies, TV production house, a 39% stake in Sky Plc, Star India, and a lineup of pay-TV channels that include FX, National Geographic and regional sports networks. Via a spinoff, Rupert Murdoch will continue to run Fox News Channel, the FS1 sports network and the Fox broadcast network in the U.S.

Viewing the combination through our Connected Society thematic lens, we see the move by Disney as solidifying not only its streaming content business but its streaming platform potential as well. Recently Disney shared that over the next few years it would launch its own streaming services, one for Disney content and one for ESPN, in order to better compete with frenemy Netflix (NFLX), Amazon (AMZN) and other streaming initiatives at Alphabet (GOOGL), Facebook (FB) and the burgeoning one at Apple (AAPL). Let’s remember these streaming services are all embracing our Content is King investing theme as they bring their own proprietary content to market to lure new subscribers and keep existing ones. We have previously shared our view that we are in a content arms race, and acquiring these Fox assets certainly adds much to the Disney war chest once the deal is completed in the next 12-18 months.

The added Connected Society benefit to be had in acquiring Fox is it ups Disney to a controlling interest in streaming service Hulu, which has roughly 12 million streaming subscribers and 250,000 subscribers for its new live TV streaming offering — the online TV package that replicates a small cable bundle. Hulu used to have three different bosses — Disney, Fox, and Comcast (CMCSA) — each owning an equal stake. Following the Disney-Fox deal, odds are Comcast’s role in Hulu will diminish and over time I would not be surprised to see Disney acquire that ownership piece as well. What this does is quickly lay a solid foundation for Disney’s streaming service plans, and I would not be shocked to see Disney convert Hulu into its own branded streaming service once the Fox acquisition closes.

From a thematic investing perspective, the Disney-Fox combination is a win-win on several levels, even though Disney is spending quite a bit of capital to get it done. The reality is there is no better company at monetizing its content and squeezing dollars from consumer wallets and in the coming quarters, Disney will have two very strong thematic tailwinds behind it — a more solidified Content is King tailwind and a burgeoning Connected Society tailwind keeping its sails full.

Near-term, this weekend is the domestic opening of the next Star Wars movie – initial reviews are very positive and advance ticket sales indicate a $200 million opening weekend or better.

  • We continue to rate Disney (DIS) shares a Buy, and our long-term price target remains $125

 

Car Maker Renault Acquires . . . a Magazine Company?

Car Maker Renault Acquires . . . a Magazine Company?

We’ve spent our fair share of time looking into the future of autonomous vehicles — the technology behind them, the players that are making it happen and the implications this new technology could have on everything from the car manufacturers to parking systems to rental car companies.

One comment, in particular, stands out from our special podcast with Brad Stertz of Audi USA when he mentioned that one of the regular comments he hears from those that have ridden in their autonomous test vehicles is that after the first few minutes, it’s well, kind of boring.  The full podcast can be played on the bottom of this post.

All of this brings us to the news out of France:

Renault SA is buying a stake in a media company as Chief Executive Officer Carlos Ghosn plans to stretch the carmaker’s suite of products to entertaining passengers in future driverless vehicles.The French automaker will purchase a 40 percent stake in Challenges Group, that publisher of the namesake weekly economic magazine as well as four monthly science and history journals, it said in a statement Wednesday. Renault and French media group will work on new content specially designed for autonomous vehicles.

Read Full Article Here: Renault Strikes Magazine Deal to Entertain Robo-Car Riders | Media – AdAge

For most, this move by Renault probably seems crazy. But for us and our thematic lens, it makes more than a fair bit of sense. If a company is going to spend enormous sums of money and effort to remove the task of driving from drivers, well then don’t you want to own a piece of the businesses that will thrive will all this new-found time on drivers’ hands? We could argue that a magazine company might not be the place to start — we’d probably look more at streaming video content as it’s such a key part of our Connected Society investment theme right now. But we applaud Renault’s foresight and a focus on what we call the Content is King investment theme.